April 10, 2008
-
出口轉內銷﹕
為何在「搶聖火」新聞上總見到藏獨分子，而不大報導其他示威者﹖
其實也不難理解。
對於西方傳媒而言，「藏獨」是最吸引的採訪目標。
對於中國傳媒而言，報導「藏獨」示威是最「安全」的。因為這樣可以令民眾以為那些「搞事者」全都是要亡我中國的。(包括香港傳媒也是這樣)共產黨哪敢告訴人民，某些來抗議的外國人，是為了中國人(如維權律師)的人權﹖
每個傳媒都有它們的偏見，包括被政府操縱的中國傳媒，和跟隨市場喜好的外國傳媒。
(更包括不知算是被政府還是市場操縱的香港傳媒……)
Comments (5)
There is a lot of Uyghurs in Europe, so i wont be too suprised to saw the E. Turkistan (i really hate to pronounce "Xinjiang" when im speaking English) flag in there. (Aft all Uyghur ARE Turkic people, they are closer to their fellow Turkic ppl like Turkish, Kazakh and Tuva then Han people. I am mentioning this because I found out many people dont even realize this, so allow me to whine in here.)
But again the PRC gov are very stupid in terms of their reaction to Tibet. Find a map from Mongol-govern/colonized dynasty can said that can prove Tibet is part of China? Then that makes China is governed by Mongolia!
Here is the news link: http://hk.news.yahoo.com/080407/12/2rxp1.html
Link to the Yuan Dystasty for those who don't know too much about history, like me: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuan_Dynasty
香港的傳媒嗎？不是見錢開眼就是死於自我審查......
@meowkun8927 - Yes, it is funny. If we 'reverted to' the map of Yuan, then the place where we call 'China' now would just be a small part of the Mogolian country, hahaha. But I was quite shocked (inspired?) to realise that not only many Chinese people are blind in front of the stupid and destructive Nationalism...... Once, when I was talking to an Italian friend, he told me that the great Romans in history were ITALIANS!!! I mean... WHAT?! Hahaha! 'Crows in the world are similarly dark (in colour)', hahaha. What we should really aim at to destroy is the anti-intellectual 'Nationalism'!
中國人很多都是歷史盲，也不慬得以史為鑑，這是身為中國人的悲哀。
香港的傳媒？放棄他們吧？不要被他們污染就好了…還可以強求什麼？
@raymondwoo -
同意。連民主派的練乙錚(4-9-2008 信報)，都竟然說西藏被中國統治700年。這顯然不是客觀。
西藏最多被華夏民族的中國統治三百年。分別是明朝(200年左右)及1911-今。蒙古帝國時期，沒有蒙古人是中國蒙古族的概念。滿族皇帝(雍正)在<大義覺迷錄>也稱，吾非中國也。當時也沒有中國滿族的概念。直至西藏派代表同意孫中山/袁世凱?的要求，西藏才加入中國版圖。
香港傳媒連中國文化也少介紹，還強求甚麼？
http://www.zonaeuropa.com/20080410_1.htm
The Olympic Torch Tour As Public Relations Disaster
There is a public relations disaster, but the question is for whom?
On one hand, the pro-Tibet protestors have managed to turn the Olympic torch processions in London and Paris into huge publicity stunts. They have gathered global media coverage for their cause.
On the other hand, it would appear that the Chinese Communists have reaped a huge publicity bonanza from the same incidents. How so? For the Chinese Communists, the responses from western government, media and citizens are immaterial. If German Chancellor Merkel won't attend the Olympic opening ceremony, it only means tickets for some others who want to come. It won't impact their existence. The paramount goal of the Chinese Communists is to retain control of China, and therefore it is the response from the Chinese citizens that matter. Thanks to the protests, the Chinese Communists may have consolidated support by its citizens for years to come.
Specifically, you can read the story here of the Chinese paralympian fencer Jin Jing carrying the Olympic torch in Paris. The following includes the photos, the report in <Liberation Daily> and then a forum/blog post made by one of her companions. Millions of Chinese readers probably cried their hearts out after reading the stuff. And this public relations show was not even scripted by the Chinese Communists, who are unlikely to ever accomplish this level of success no matter how hard they try. Faced with the beautiful heroine with one leg, how is any liberal dissidence on behalf of Tibet independence going to work inside Chinese? This was a bonanza handed to the Chinese Communists by the pro-Tibet protestors.
As the Olympic torch tour progresses to the United States, Australia, South Korea, etc, the Chinese Communists are probably hoping that other protestors would make similar showings for their own causes (Xinjiang independence, FLG, vindication of June 4th, etc). That would guarantee that those causes will never become accepted into mainstream Chinese opinion for the next generation.
Comments are closed.